Home Eurasia Economy of the Eurasian Continent EDB Monitoring of Mutual Investments

EDB Monitoring of Mutual Investments

Alexey Kuznetsov, Evgeny Vinokurov, Kirill Nikulin, Taras Tsukarev, Anton Malakhov
(Report 21/4)

The Eurasian Development Bank has relaunched its flagship analytical project to monitor mutual direct investments by twelve states (CIS countries and Georgia). The project is based on a bottom-up database of mutual direct investments, its main sources being company reports and other primary information. The project makes it possible to account for investments made through offshore structures and other “trans-shipping destinations”. In this respect, the project’s database differs from official central bank statistics.

Over a ten-year horizon, the mutual direct investment stock by post-Soviet countries declined in 2013–2015. Monitoring data show that since 2017 EAEU companies have been ensuring an upturn in mutual FDI in the CIS. Between 2016 and 2020, investments by the Eurasian corporate sector led to a 25% increase in total mutual FDI in the CIS, to US $45.9 billion (Figure 1).

By the end of 2020, the mutual investment stock of the EAEU countries reached US $25.4 billion, up 24% over the last four years. Kazakhstan boasts the highest FDI stock value and growth rate among the EAEU member states: US $11.2 billion at the end of 2020, and an increase of US $3 billion over four years.

Bank analysts note that corporate ties within the EAEU are more intense than those within the CIS. At the end of 2020, the share of mutual FDI stock of EAEU member states in total mutual CIS FDI amounted to 55%.  

That said, investment ties between the EAEU and other CIS countries remain strong. At the end of 2020, the relevant FDI amounted to US $18 billion (39% of total FDI of the CIS countries). Most projects are in Trade (both Wholesale Trade and Retail Trade), as well as in Financial Services, Real Estate, and Machine Engineering. The most capital-intensive projects were in Extraction of Oil and Natural Gas and Chemical Industry. 

The report suggests that the growth of mutual FDI in the EAEU is qualitative. Investors are increasingly interested in knowledge-intensive production, greenfield projects, and projects with low capital intensity. This facilitates the modernisation and diversification of the EAEU economies.

“In the coming years, the sectoral structure of mutual FDI will gradually become more diversified with the development of Retail Trade, Financial Services, and Manufacture of Machines and Equipment,” said Evgeny Vinokurov, Chief Economist at the EDB and the EFSD. “With the growing importance of the global climate agenda, mutual FDI in green economy projects will also grow. Over the past two years, mutual FDI in such projects has increased by 56%. Kazakhstan will consolidate its leadership in attracting direct investments in renewable energy, and Uzbekistan will become one of the largest recipients of FDI not only from Russia but from other EAEU member states as well.”

At the end of 2020, the key sectors in terms of mutual FDI stock values in the CIS were Extraction of Oil and Natural Gas (22.8% of total FDI stock), Chemical Industry (11.9%), and Mining of Metal Ores (11.0%) (Figure 2). The predominance of projects in Extraction of Oil and Natural Gas was due to Russia’s projects in Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan.

The sectoral structure of mutual FDI in the EAEU countries differs from that in the CIS. The leading sector in the EAEU is Mining of Metal Ores (19.8%), followed by Land Transport and Transport via Pipelines (14%) and Financial Services (11.4%) (Figure 2). Extraction of Oil and Natural Gas (9.5%) ranks only fourth. The leading position of Mining of Metal Ores is secured by projects in Russia and Kazakhstan. EDB analysts estimate that this sector contributed the most to the increase of mutual FDI stock of EAEU member states over the last four years (US $2.2 billion).

The report notes an emerging trend – the growth of mutual FDI of the EAEU countries in the Manufacture of Motor Vehicles, Machines, and Electrical Equipment. Over the past three years, FDI in this sector has increased by a factor of 1.6. The absolute figures remain small for the time being.

Interestingly, national private investors dominate the ownership structure of companies that invest within the EAEU, with a share of 55% at the end of 2020. The share of state-controlled investors (with the state’s equity participation of more than 50%) has remained almost unchanged since 2016 and made up 36% in 2020. The number of projects where foreign transnational corporations are among the investor company owners has declined from 10% to 6% over the last five years.

There have been significant changes in the rating of the mutual CIS FDI recipient countries. Kazakhstan steadily tops the list of FDI recipients and is now followed by Uzbekistan. Russia has fallen by two notches while Azerbaijan came close to it in 2020 with the fifth ranking. Ukraine has moved from the top ranking in 2012 to eighth by the end of 2020 (Figure 3).

Russia is the only net exporter of mutual FDI stock in the post-Soviet area. At the end of 2020, Russian investors accounted for 80% of total outward FDI to both the EAEU and CIS countries. Kazakhstan is Russia’s main investment partner, with 30% of total Russian outward FDI in the CIS countries.

Russian investors are building up capital investments in the CIS countries, especially in Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan. Over the past four years, Russian FDI in Uzbekistan has grown 2.1 times and in Azerbaijan 1.2 times. Uzbekistan received 99% of all post-Soviet FDI from Russia (US $9 billion) (Figure 4), and Azerbaijan 99.3% (US $4.2 billion).

You can also view the report EDB Monitoring of Mutual Investments at the EDB website.

Other reports by the EDB and EFSD are available in the Research section on the Bank’s website and the Publications section on the Fund’s website.

Subscribe to my newsletter:
By submitting this form, you agree to the Privacy policy.
arrow-up